| dc.contributor.advisor |
Králík, Lukáš
|
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Pozdnyshev, Nikita
|
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2025-12-10T23:09:56Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2025-12-10T23:09:56Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2024-10-27 |
|
| dc.identifier |
Elektronický archiv Knihovny UTB |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10563/57898
|
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Tato bakaláZská práce porovnává 23 softwarových nástrojp pro obnovu dat z HDD a ext4. PZedstavuje pět klí ových algoritmp: file carving, reverzní in enýrství metadat, log-based recovery, redundantní analýzu a obnovu pomocí strojového u ení. Na disku s 1,8 GB dat a oddíly NTFS/FAT32 byly simulovány logické i fyzické ztráty. Ú innost nástrojp byla hodnocena podle 5 kritérií rozhraní a 24 kritérií integrity. Mezi bezplatnými nástroji dosáhly nejlepbích výsledkp DMDE a Puran File Recovery. Z placených vynikly R-Studio, DiskGenius, DMDE Pro, MiniTool PDR a CuteRecovery. Komer ní software si pZi obnově smazaných oddílp udr el úspěbnost kolem 95 %, ale některé bezplatné klesly pod 80 %. Cena licencí 0399 USD odrá í hlavně komfort a podporu. Doporu ený postup: vytvoZit bitovou kopii, zkusit zdarma, poté placený nástroj, a nakonec profesionální servis. |
|
| dc.format |
71 s. (101 466 znaků) |
|
| dc.language.iso |
cs |
|
| dc.publisher |
Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně |
|
| dc.rights |
Bez omezení |
|
| dc.subject |
obnova dat
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
náklady na obnovu
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
NTFS
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
FAT32
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
ext4
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
ekonomická efektivita
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
minimalizace výdajp
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
DMDE
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
R-Studio
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
Puran File Recovery
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
CuteRecovery
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
ztracená data
|
cs |
| dc.subject |
data recovery
|
en |
| dc.subject |
recovery cost
|
en |
| dc.subject |
NTFS
|
en |
| dc.subject |
FAT32
|
en |
| dc.subject |
ext4
|
en |
| dc.subject |
economic efficiency
|
en |
| dc.subject |
cost minimization
|
en |
| dc.subject |
DMDE
|
en |
| dc.subject |
R-Studio
|
en |
| dc.subject |
Puran File Recovery
|
en |
| dc.subject |
CuteRecovery
|
en |
| dc.subject |
lost data
|
en |
| dc.title |
Obnova dat |
|
| dc.title.alternative |
Data Recovery |
|
| dc.type |
bakalářská práce |
cs |
| dc.contributor.referee |
Malaník, David |
|
| dc.date.accepted |
2025-06-16 |
|
| dc.description.abstract-translated |
This bachelor's thesis compares 23 software tools for data recovery from HDDs and ext4. It presents five key algorithms: file carving, reverse engineering of metadata, log-based recovery, redundant data analysis, and recovery using machine learning. An experiment with a 1.8GB dataset and NTFS/FAT32 partitions simulated logical and physical data loss. The tools were evaluated using 5 interface criteria and 24 data integrity criteria. Among the free tools, DMDE and Puran File Recovery achieved the best results. Among the paid ones, R-Studio, DiskGenius, DMDE Pro, MiniTool PDR, and CuteRecovery stood out. Commercial tools maintained around 95 % success in recovering deleted partitions, while some free tools fell below 80 %. License prices 0399 USD mainly reflect interface comfort and support. The recommended procedure: create a bit-by-bit image, try free tools, then paid tools, and finally professional service. |
|
| dc.description.department |
Ústav informatiky a umělé inteligence |
|
| dc.thesis.degree-discipline |
Softwarové inženýrství |
cs |
| dc.thesis.degree-discipline |
Software Engineering |
en |
| dc.thesis.degree-grantor |
Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně. Fakulta aplikované informatiky |
cs |
| dc.thesis.degree-grantor |
Tomas Bata University in Zlín. Faculty of Applied Informatics |
en |
| dc.thesis.degree-name |
Bc. |
|
| dc.thesis.degree-program |
Softwarové inženýrství |
cs |
| dc.thesis.degree-program |
Software Engineering |
en |
| dc.identifier.stag |
70383
|
|
| dc.date.submitted |
2025-06-02 |
|